KKK888
ist hier aktiv
- Registriert
- 22. September 2012
- Beiträge
- 966
Wann checken die Plagiats-Blockwarte eigentlich mal die Doktorarbeiten von SPD, Grüne & Co ?
mutig behauptet: da sind eben keine Plagiate?
Oder bist du Hellseher?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Anmerkung: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wann checken die Plagiats-Blockwarte eigentlich mal die Doktorarbeiten von SPD, Grüne & Co ?
mutig behauptet: da sind eben keine Plagiate?
Oder bist du Hellseher?
In der CDU/FDP etc. gibt es halt so viele Titelträger, weil die teilweise sehr vertrottelte Wählerschaft darin nen Beweis für politische Kompetenz sieht. Mittlerweile sehen wir ja, dass wir es da häufig nur mit schamlosen Betrügern zu tun haben. Der Doktortitel ist ja quasi schon eingeplant für die pol. Karriere. Lächerliche Wichser, das hat schon alles System.
Würde ich eher umgekehrt sehen. Die Wählerschaft von CDU und SPD hat eher ein Mißtrauen gegenüber Akademikern. Die stehen doch auf "bodenständig" und sowas. Viele kleine Kurt Becks.
Steht bald der Rücktritt von Gysi an ? Hat dem jemand mal seine Doktorarbeit kontrolliert ?
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deuts...egen-verdacht-auf-falschaussage-a-882461.html
Wann checken die Plagiats-Blockwarte eigentlich mal die Doktorarbeiten von SPD, Grüne & Co ?
http://de.statista.com/statistik/da...n-und-professoren-im-bundestag-nach-parteien/
Habe ich mir ungefähr so gedacht.
In his “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren”,
J. M. Keynes (1930) predicted that one hundred years later we would have to work less than 15 hours per week.
The paper was based on lectures given in 1928.
Thus his prediction was originally about the year2028 -in only 18 years from now.
15 hour week = 3 hours per day during a 5-day week, or only 2 days’ of today’s ‘normal’ working days.
(eg. work on Saturday and Sunday, and have Mo-Fri free).
But it could be less than that: The 15 hours work he talked about were a recommendation for psychological reasons only, to keep people occupied & challenged (“everybody needs to do some work ifhe is to be contented”, Keynes), not because even 15 hours were necessary.
Keynes was so convinced that productivity gains and economic growth would reduce needed working hours that he spent much of his essay on the issue of how to solve the main problem of the future, namely what to do with all our spare time.
Are we getting there?
His prediction about a largely work-free life sounds as much like the distant future to us today as it did to people 81 years ago.
Or perhaps it seems more remote a prospectto us now, because we have 81 years more of experience to look back on –time when this promise did not materialise.
Working hours in the USA, one of the most advanced economies, are known to be particularly long and have even deteriorated in recent decades.
Keynes’ analysis was as follows:
He predicted that average living standards would rise between four to eight times in the following 100 years.
This implies an ave. income growth of 1.4% to 2.1% per year over 100 years.
This growth was seen as being due to productivity gains.
Wages grow with productivity (or at least with economic growth).
Hence with such exponential growth (driven by technology), we would soon end thefamiliar struggle for subsistence(“secular slavery of economic necessity”) –to work 9 to 5 or more, to pay off the debt, the mortgage, to feed the family –but instead transforming the central problem of humanity from survival into how to use our abundant leisure time meaningfully.
Work only for 2 to 3 days per week, to stay sane.
Was this analysis wrong?
Was Keynes’ prediction of exponential economic growth, due to technology-driven productivity growth, too optimistic?
No.
Keynes’ prediction of income growth was correct, for Europe, US/Canada, Japan
On current trends, in 2030, growth at the historic rate will imply an 8-fold increase, the upper range of Keynes’ prediction.
His growth prediction and his forecast of the exponential rise in per capita income were remarkably accurate.
The premiseson which Keynes derived his conclusion have come true
So why is his conclusion and prediction likely to be wrong?
Keynes predicted average per capita income. His predictions were correct.
But the average hides huge inequality.
Keynes did not foresee that society could become this wealthy, without sharing the benefits of the wealth more equally and reducing work.
The majority of households is dependent on wages and salaries in an employed relationship, or as self-employed entrepreneurs.
But wages did not keep pace with economic growth or productivity.
The majority of the benefits of economic growth has gone elsewhere – not to those working for a wage or a salary.
How is this possible? What is the mechanism?
The mechanism is the monetary system, and the instrument is called interest:
The majority of the benefits of economic growth has gone into paying interest, and interest on interest, to a small minority.
The benefits of economic growth have been concentrated in the top 1-2% of the income distribution, who live off the interest on accumulated wealth.
They do not have to work for a living – their working hours are reduced to zero.
No “trickling down” of the benefits of growth to the majority has happened, as Keynes envisioned, to free people from daily long working hours.
100 Prominente Kiffer fordern die dreißig Stunden Woche.
http://www.taz.de/Weniger-Arbeiten/!110739/
is wohl nicht machbar aber was is daran kifferei? alles andere ist sklaverei.
man hat bei diesen arbeitszeiten doch keine freizeit. es gibt noch viele andere berufsfelder, die noch am wochende arbeiten können. tausende überstunden hier und da.
man arbeitet nicht um zu leben, man lebt um zu arbeiten.
Man muss doch auch mal realistisch bleiben. Wir leben nicht mehr im Wirtschaftswunderland sondern stehen in Konkurrenz zu Ländern wo Menschen 60 Stunden im der Woche für deutlich weniger Lohn arbeiten.
Das Problem: Globalisierungskapitalismus!!
Typisch Deutsch. Nichts arbeiten wollen aber meckern warum Ausländer die dicken Autos bei uns fahren.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.